First the land use planning is very important. Cities can be created with a mix of different land use. This will
make our communities more convenient and safe.

Second is to promote the rececling to conserve energy and water, also reduce waste and pollution.

Third is to change transportation planning. More people will travel by walking, biking, and public transit.

Fourth is to restore natural
environments, such as woodlots, rivers, and wetlands in cities.

Fifth is to encourage the building of safe, conveniently located, and
affordable housing for people in all economic groups.

i 'd like to say something.to chase
economical benefit,we must think of
the long term plan.we can do lot of
things for it.for example,making
recicle water tube.it's justto linkthe
washing machine to a big jar.in
countryside,try to use manure and
reduce to use fertilizer.collect wast
paper and don't use plastic bag.don't
produce things that can use one
times.in short term it's not
convenintand cost more.but future is
bright.

The whole scenario feels like a catch-
22 sinkhole. If the small, financially
affluent percentage of the population
is responsible for consuming soaring
amounts of the Earth's resources (some
studies say 75%)then it is these people
who must make changes to their
lifestyle and behaviour.
Suggestions to curb urban dwellers from
gobbling resources include more
environmentally-sound products,
services and living environments. The
problem is these are often so expensive
that only the upper crust can afford
them. If the source of the problem also
holds the key to the solution then what
can be done?
As projections of ecolgocial footprints
and deficits anticipate our current
consumption as requiring five more
planet Earths to maintain our current
way of living it seems that sooner or
later we are all going to pay.