CANADIAN GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY   |    CANADIAN ATLAS ONLINE   |    CANADIAN ENVIRONMENT AWARDS   |    GEOCHALLENGE   |    GEOGRAPHIC EDUCATION
Canadian Geographic magazine
WHAT'S NEW4 July 2008
Check out the Adventure Zone!
more »
RSS Feed WHAT IS RSS?
 PRINT   EMAIL  AA
SUBSCRIBE RENEW GIVE A GIFT NEWSLETTER
magazine / apr08

April 2008 issue


FEATURE
No reservations (page 4)

Not everyone has been so encouraging. Farmers in Delta are fiercely protective of the municipality’s dwindling agricultural lands and want to prevent possible development on the property the Tsawwassen will assume as part of the treaty, much of which falls on prime vegetable and berry farmland. Farming associations criticized the transfer, as did most Vancouver area municipal governments and several members of the provincial legislature. “This treaty, in addressing old wrongs, is writing into history, I believe, a new wrong,” Delta North MLA Guy Gentner, a former Delta councillor, told the B.C. Legislature. “The province’s willingness to barter away farmland is the death knell for more to be lost.”


Advertisement


top

The wisdom of the Ngai Tahu
As a negotiator for the New Zealand government between 1995 and 1999, I worked on the first comprehensive treaty settlement in that country, the Ngai Tahu Treaty, completed in 1998. Like the Tsawwassen, the Ngai Tahu, a South Island Maori tribe, made pragmatic decisions about what they needed most. Apart from vital cultural recognition and a fair settlement of past wrongs, they wanted a robust economic agreement, including cash and land for commercial investment.

Rather than accept whatever land the government offered, however, the Ngai Tahu (pronounced nye-TUH-hoo) elected to take a larger capital sum, $170 million (N.Z.), and purchase new land. The New Zealand government also returned dozens of sacred and historic sites, many of them to be managed by the Ngai Tahu as public parks.

Perhaps most important, the treaty included an apology from the Crown for past wrongs.

There is nothing equivalent to an Indian band in New Zealand, and the Ngai Tahu’s leadership comprises a board and trustee system, with its treaty assets held by a corporation in which all members are shareholders. A corporate structure doesn’t necessarily lend itself well to a traditional way of doing things, however, and 10 years on, there have been disputes about leadership strategies and some members complain they have no say in decision making. In 2006, there was a major reorganization of the management of Ngai Tahu Holdings (NTH), the tribe’s investment arm, and there has been a high turnover of chief executives.

Nonetheless, theirs is a success story. The Ngai Tahu invested their settlement capital and now grant hundreds of thousands of dollars annually in scholarships. Personal savings for education or housing are matched dollar for dollar. And with numerous tourism locations and real estate holdings, NTH operates several multi-million-dollar businesses. Above all, the Ngai Tahu are living the vision outlined in the treaty: “For us and our children after us.”

K.G.

Opposition to the agreement from other First Nations has been equally emphatic. Numerous groups have asserted that the Tsawwassen’s treaty lands lie within their own traditional territories and should not be transferred until their own rights to those lands have been addressed. The Semiahmoo First Nation in nearby White Rock and an alliance of Vancouver Island First Nations launched legal proceedings in June 2007 in an attempt to halt further progress on the treaty. Their case was rejected in the B.C. Supreme Court in November 2007.

Closer to home, at Canoe Pass on the Fraser River, where the Tsawwassen will have ownership of several parcels of land, Raymond Wilson is at the forefront of a drive by the Hwlitsum First Nation to gain its own land. Fearful that there will be none left for his people, Wilson has fought the Tsawwassen every step of the way during the past 14 years. He, too, has so far been unsuccessful.

Nor is the opposition just local. First Nations from the Fraser Valley that have begun their own treaty negotiations have banded together with those on Vancouver Island in an attempt to force governments to change what have, until now, been non-negotiable mandates, such as the policy on removing the tax exemption. A unified front, they say, is essential to success; in agreeing to accept such policies, the Tsawwassen First Nation has let them down.

Others outside the process are just as adamant. “I believe strongly in the just reconciliation of the land question,” says Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, president of the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs, a provincial organization advocating against current government-treaty policy. “But I don’t believe this process does it.”

In addition to the external resistance, 30 Tsawwassen residents actively opposed the deal. Some were reluctant because of an inherent distrust of government, which has a long history of marginalizing First Nations. Russell Williams, Baird’s uncle by marriage, remembers Air Force practices taking place in front of the reserve during the Second World War. Once, machine-gun shells burst through the window of a house. Williams also recalls a dummy bomb ripping a hole in the home of Baird’s grandfather, Simon Joe; thankfully, no one was home. “How do we get along with the governments,” he asks, "when we’ve been so oppressed?"

Some feared losing their government overseers, on whom they have come to depend. “We’ll be losing INAC’s responsibility for us,” says Bertha Williams (no relation to Russell). “Who will we turn to then?”

Bertha also raises concerns about losing the long-held tax exemption when incomes are low to begin with. “There’s all this pretty talk about revenue and development. but how is that going to benefit us as individuals?” She considers the tax exemption to be part of her identity. “It’s who we are now. There’s no other place in the world where people have a special status like this.”

« Previous page Next page »

Comments on this articleLeave a comment

Tax Exeption does not, and has never, defined First Nation status in any way shape or form. Culture and ethnicity are neither reinforced nor proven by such a trivial and useless thing. While it is difficult for some to believe, it wasn't a hard decision to give up 'tax free status' and instead take back the right to determine independently who is an who is not Tsawwassen, develop lands apropriately and safely, create and establish governing policies... the list is too long for this space. To be out from under the Indian Act and be considered fully human is a long-held dream that is finally being realized.

Submitted by openeyes on Monday, May 19, 2008


Who is going to read this? I would like the Dubia's of the world to do so, so we can approach this from a global perspective as opposed to another version of urban sprawl. I have coined the term Greener Gateway to describe a healthy approach. Any takers?

Submitted by remo williams on Wednesday, April 09, 2008


This group reneging their tax rights is a strong step in the right direction. Like some writer wrote re. the resources on tribal lands: "they teach us how to dig them up and carry them out." This move is a step toward independence.
It is like an adolescent leaving home for the first time. It may be painful and they may stumble, but when they get it right, they will rock.

Submitted by Ramona Kiyoshk, Ojibway on Wednesday, April 09, 2008






Search our site: British Columbia, Tsawwassen, First Nation





Search our site: British Columbia, Tsawwassen, First Nation

ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Canadian Geographic Magazine and Save
Province 
Privacy Policy  


Meet our client partners
CG Contests
Featured Destinations
Smooth Operators
ADventures
Classifieds
Advertiser Directory

© 2008 Canadian Geographic Enterprises ADVERTISE WITH US   |    PRODUCTS & SERVICES   |    PRESS DESK   |    PRIVACY POLICY   |    CONTACT US   |    SITEMAP