 |
magazine / apr08
 |
April 2008 issue |
|
|
 |
FEATURE
No reservations (page 2)
Among other things, the treaty, one of British Columbia’s
first such agreements in 150 years, will create a new form
of geographic tenure in Canada. The reserve will disappear,
and for the first time, provincial land-use laws will apply to
territory governed by a First Nation. Also for the first time,
a First Nation government — not an Indian Act band,
but a new form of democratic self-governing body —
will have the kind of control over its own land use that
municipalities currently enjoy.
top
Individual Tsawwassen members will be able to own
land and will eventually pay sales tax and income tax.
The new Tsawwassen government, which will receive
a lump-sum payment of about $20 million and an additional
334 hectares of land, will have control over its assets and will
be able to pursue economic development projects to produce revenue and jobs for its members without having to ask
permission from Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC)
bureaucrats in Ottawa.
|
’We’ll be losing
the federal government’s
responsibility for us,’
says Bertha Williams.
’Who will we turn to then?’
She considers
the tax exemption
to be part of her identity.
’It’s who we are now.
There’s no place in the world
where people have
a special status like this.’ |
None of it was easy or without controversy, and those
who continue to oppose the agreement are legion. Nearly
20 percent of voting band members rejected the treaty.
Neighbouring farming associations criticized the land
transfer. Nearby bands and other B.C. First Nations that have
begun the treaty process also fought against the agreement,
concerned about the precedent-setting provisions that will
oblige members to start paying taxes.
Throughout it all, Baird forged ahead, driven by a vision
of a new future for her daughters and her people. “This isn’t
just about money,” she told band members last summer.
“It’s about putting a long, sad chapter of poverty and
dependence behind us.”
For nearly four years, I sat across the negotiating
table from Baird. Originally from New Zealand, I worked
on a landmark treaty there between the government of New
Zealand and the Ngai Tahu people that gave them greater
control over their economic development, natural resources
and cultural heritage. After moving to Canada, I was hired
in 2000 as the chief negotiator on the Tsawwassen land
claim for the government of British Columbia. Baird was
head of the Tsawwassen negotiating team, which by then was
in its seventh year of treaty talks. “It is fundamental that we
regain our land,” she told me. “We want control back.”
The federal government exerts its control over qualifying
aboriginal people in Canada with a 132-year-old statute
known as the Indian Act. The legislation provides a tax
exemption for Indians living and working on reserves and
annual program funding delivered by INAC. But the Indian
Act also has significant drawbacks. INAC’s $5.5 billion
budget for the services it provides to Indian reserves is split
among more than 1,200 organizations across the country,
including 640 Indian bands, or First Nations. INAC funding
is never adequate to meet community needs, and it is
difficult for bands to raise their own revenue. Nobody on
a reserve owns land outright, either individually or collectively,
making it next to impossible to borrow money from a bank
to build or buy a house or start a business on a reserve.
Band governments, in the form of elected chiefs and
councils, have limited bylaw-making powers and are shackled
by a heavy-handed federal bureaucracy that sets the
priorities for how government funding is spent on reserves.
Bands must troop, hat in hand, to Ottawa for permission to
undertake major initiatives.
At one time, children of Indian women who married non-
Indians automatically lost their status. Thus disenfranchised,
many aboriginal people drifted away from their communities.
Some status Indians have left their reserves to follow job
opportunities or non-aboriginal spouses. For those who
wished to remain living on the land on which they and their
forebears were born, there was little option but to remain an
Indian under the Indian Act, living on an Indian reserve.
But in 1973, a Supreme Court of Canada decision
favouring the legal aboriginal rights of the Nisga’a Nation
to its traditional lands on the remote north coast of
British Columbia forced the federal government to the
negotiating table at last. The provincial government joined
the process in 1991, and the Nisga’a Treaty came into force
in 2000. Elsewhere in Canada, the land claims of the
Inuit of Canada’s eastern Arctic were settled with the
creation of Nunavut in April 1999.
Where Tsawwassen differs from its predecessors is in
its geography and its potential influence. Like Nunavut,
the Nisga’a territory is far enough out of sight that
negotiations, while controversial, did not affect the daily lives
of many non-aboriginals. But the Tsawwassen Treaty is the
first to be settled in a difficult urban context: the fishbowl
that is British Columbia’s highly politicized Vancouver
region. It has attracted wide attention, and is proving to have
far-reaching implications not only for First Nations but
for their non-aboriginal neighbours as well.
| Comments on this article | Leave a comment | Who is going to read this? I would like the Dubia's of the world to do so, so we can approach this from a global perspective as opposed to another version of urban sprawl. I have coined the term Greener Gateway to describe a healthy approach. Any takers?
This group reneging their tax rights is a strong step in the right direction. Like some writer wrote re. the resources on tribal lands: "they teach us how to dig them up and carry them out." This move is a step toward independence. It is like an adolescent leaving home for the first time. It may be painful and they may stumble, but when they get it right, they will rock.
|
|
 |
| ADVERTISEMENT |
|
|
 |
|